You're watching...
“On China” author Dr. Henry Kissinger on the impact on the U.S. of China’s growing economy.
Also in this playlist...
Auto-advance: ON
Auto-advance
This transcript is automatically generated
Henry Kissinger back with us on China is the best seller that addresses this very issue -- -- -- have -- back on the -- -- Everyone gets nervous about child because they say that.
No matter what we did it even if we want to lend more money in the middle east of standard influence.
We're effectively doing it.
On borrowed money underwritten -- -- What do you make.
That China heads developed did speed but nobody -- so.
And -- opening to China -- could it puts a very underdeveloped country.
And into who couldn't of one of up into who -- student at the moment to a city.
Code book from the balancing of the Soviet Union.
Richard contended the pickets that.
Who do wounded retreat now find out okay have grown a bit raid of hatred and pretend.
For city year.
And even though -- -- -- from the Betty and obeyed situation though approaching.
Limit to -- -- did economy's beginning to be compared to -- -- even though the per capita income.
It's didn't only.
The friction of about convivial on the -- approach will look.
And for an extended period of time.
No fundamental do -- you we we should that we have to pay taxes.
Could have a -- took.
Secondly I emigrated mine.
Sick -- -- -- -- Should we -- -- situation though.
Mid to committed similar to what existed in Europe.
Prior to -- that it's it's a country coming up.
Which is of mending its committed any capacity in the -- -- -- -- -- -- countries.
And the United States could never.
-- its national security reached -- through that.
The Chinese have -- to become stronger listed economy grows it's mathematically.
-- -- push an inch.
Run in China.
-- tried it inevitable growth admitted that it didn't.
Be conducted in such a rate that they threaten its global challenge do you think it could -- it.
Attempt attempt to some extent it cooked it.
It that's not yet.
-- -- -- -- -- -- And he.
-- two MP idiot.
Full.
And the bigger threat to the secretary that and I've raises the time from when his I don't know -- you've talked about its flirtation with the presidency but when I asked and how you handle China.
And and and the fact details and so much of our debt.
He would say China needs us more than we need -- and -- today try to retaliate by.
-- I'm not buying our treasury notes and bonds or further selling.
Can we stop buying their stuff when I said -- that would lead to a trade war he said -- they still need us when we.
Need -- and and that furthermore our posture with China has always been.
On defense will always afraid we're always afraid to -- -- -- We have we we have to defend a fundamental economic.
And -- -- entries.
Committed -- -- anyone.
But we shouldn't keep didn't meet should vote to keep in mind that votes.
Have produced -- and stupidity to conduct -- the relationship.
And set to evade that they understand that this is that in normal.
Situations -- loved to prep for Villanova.
I understand that but to the point and the threat.
Raised -- enhance it by China that it.
You also -- tree -- of our debt that -- could start unloading that it could you ever see them doing that.
That I previous guidance that if they have voted did did they could -- -- -- certainly here.
And they.
Economy is based very loud -- export.
And one of recommendations to them it's -- -- put more effort to its own consumption.
And let's unexploded noted through -- -- the so put China it would not be attributed that if -- -- -- -- still -- strongest nation in the room.
And if China get into -- extend -- confrontation with us in the light of all the problems they have.
With respect to unemployment.
Up to -- -- moving people from the country.
In the in into the cities.
And and -- -- difficulties I think it would use CAD reach out to the.
Switching -- are very quickly Israel wanted to get your take you know it's been -- a couple of weeks now.
Benjamin Netanyahu.
His treatment in this country is on usual dressing down of the president.
In the Oval Office and what is otherwise a photo -- and I read a great deal of Israeli press secretary of the English version.
They're nervous over there they didn't like the treatment over there on.
The United States is of course a huge country it's -- just -- tiny country you can drive from.
-- -- definitive to the other.
In an.
So the men who have run -- -- of editorial adjustment should look like a few months to it's.
It looked like good news for good percentage of dictated -- to dip into and start from that it took.
-- didn't that relationship.
It demonstration of trust between the two sides.
It's an essential component and so am I mean I don't know we have -- the president didn't and one day at the Israeli prime minister another day.
Get into a public debate.
On issues today I believe -- -- very educated for the public plan and put.
You you know these sessions -- gonna let -- that's why I -- on the status after the fact.
This protocol in the White House when a leader comes and they both sit down it's in the Oval Office right in front of that potted you know -- they ever.
Could you -- you ever see anything like.
I have right.
You know every administration has its own way of doing things.
And I would security -- I took to view.
Have been they had took us government needed victory it's really.
American.
They could pretty -- know ahead of time what the other runners -- say.
Because when they disagreed there's no -- you can appeal to -- that.
The top.
I have not seen -- -- truth.
Confrontation.
Of its kind people -- but it came time I think it -- -- Google because.
Depicted in.
Spoken out there vaguely about good demand -- tip -- into blood detectives have been put that.
That could have many mean it's going to take a quick break -- I wanna get.
