Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
Let's turn -- to immigration -- word op today.
Bright part dot com reporting.
Other that they have corroborated sources saying that -- congressman go -- Bob go block the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee is ready to rescue the -- the once -- on a rival gang of eight immigration.
Bill your reaction.
But that's a silly way to put it what good -- doing is what that Republicans in the house have always said they were going to get.
And they're always vaguely understood what the senate -- then they're going to.
I agreed a wedge that shut it puts out as they're opening -- But the house Republicans want to see.
The border -- secure without spending -- Jillian dollars.
We're gonna do something on that the DREAM Act for people who work you know four years old when they came across.
The border and are now in college.
Or trying to get into the military.
We need and as an economy.
More H one B visas is the high -- These -- right now we're telling people we can't come -- stay in -- -- start -- company to compete with -- he can't come here -- to Canada and start a company to compete with us.
Some of the best minds in the world wanna come to America be Americans and create companies -- over that compete throughout the world we want to -- -- -- -- I get so tired.
This immigration debate because there's so much misinformation spewed by well intentioned people.
And intelligent people none more better intention than you know and brighter.
But the fact of the matter H one B visas are not -- issue at all we have in this and available to us.
-- A tremendous number of H one B visas let's say we doubled -- -- The fact is technology companies in principle among them.
Or outsourcing companies and principal among those are Indian outsourcing companies that are using BH one B visas and they are strong -- -- At the heart of people American citizens who are seeking those jobs.
If we want to do something seriously I have to ask you this why in the world where have you been and where has the chamber of commerce man and others.
In simply opening -- -- says to those most skilled and highly intelligent and educated and bring him to this country.
Because in each instance you're not talking about those people.
We should they and I say trying to be -- people generally mean when they say hi tech visas were also talking about stem education.
People who come the United States.
I get a Ph.D.
NS science technology engineering and mathematics.
And then we throw them out of the country -- I don't really enough people.
How well we don't sort of -- -- work we don't let you -- and our discussion about immigration without denigrating this country and its character and its generous and welcoming immigration policy.
Then I will tell you this.
You all are doing to further failure.
Do the right thing that secure the border quit gaming the system talk honestly forthrightly and come forward with plants that's what the house is doing.
It has a chance of working.
Don't that you all screw it up.
-- that's exactly what we're looking to -- we've been trying to you know -- -- years.
Not on the effort to get to allow some of the real talent in this in the world to come to united -- And we do tell people that stem degrees -- they can't stay low that's just.
And -- -- -- -- that there aren't three nations in the world who bring as many people into their countries is too weak.
There aren't they -- a handful of countries -- world combined.
Who had as its generous AAA.
Immigration policy that's why we're only more on this as well denigrating the country.
And move ahead to actually reforming immigration law.
And doing it in the national interest and go Obama has that -- just doing it if he rolls over -- they all the accomplice to want to sit there and throw the borders open.
It's going to be a day absolute.
Despair in this country can't do the right thing.
Door to the right way.
That is exactly what we're working on doing and the entire head business community and all the various committees -- they are united.
In making those steps forward I I'm very supportive.
-- -- Ronald Reagan Jack Kemp approach toward and I tell you how I am I strong economic -- icons here's the deal.
How about this in the national interest right now on the 21 century you talk about the sovereignty of the nation.
The national interest you secure the border and I don't mean.
Playing rhetorical games were operational control is as this secretary of the Department of Homeland Security rituals -- will.
Who will soon be leading.
The University of California system take a look at the proposal that congressman to call -- Texas has put forward.
I think it's a serious -- -- that will secure the border he's put it forward it's been passed through the Republican.
Committee there I think that that rather than what the senate did is an improvement.
We also need to have a guest worker program talk to farmers and -- -- they're not able to get the workers that they need in this country.
Two out to the farms -- what did you tell her jobs I heard exactly the same or rhetoric the same reasoning the same -- -- In 2006 and seven when it went down to defeat none of us want that to happen.
So let's go to the issue up without -- I think the president does I think the president does not want perhaps I'm -- cast aspersions on this I'm not gonna question anyone's motives are going to say simply.
If you want to reform immigration and you must control the border.
Because if you cannot control the border you can't control immigration.
And everything everyone says about it after that there is pure bull so it has to begin as a condition preceding.
Actual real bona fide verifiable border security and internal enforcement just as the house judiciary has moved.
In its legislation.
Will you support without.
You seem to be trying to disagree with me when I'm not sure no I'm trying to I'm try got you mistake right -- mistake my words I am seeking your agreement.
I I don't -- -- your say yes.
-- -- Although we haven't been disagreeing I don't know why even trying to disagree air.
What what it is -- -- trying to disagree Grover I am simply seeking -- affirmation -- grim death.
I hope what you don't want to -- I think.
What the Republicans in the house you're doing is being serious.
About our border security which in this administration has not done.
The house the senate took some bites -- the apple but there handicap.
The Democrats run the house the senate in that's how sure that it may have very well clarity say it very clearly for.
The game -- and we're confident but they backed legislation is of ours it is the game that I said should be avoided.
And now the house it's got to take a look at it I think good luck is looking at moving forward on a whole series of vicious we can and -- How that serious pro growth immigration policy that's good for the country good for the American people.
And historically it's.
The reason why we're the future and China isn't.
And ship has always been and what Europe -- -- we want if I have a future.
We want Russia to have a future we want India to have a future we all we have ever wanted to hear your Grenada but that we have a brighter future than they do.
Because we do -- well I've spent our history for 200 years.
Well you can do better than we have done recently.
I think that Barbara Mark -- appreciate your support for -- and -- -- intelligent.
National interest approach.
Thank you so much for although I think we're agreeing care and I want every gun.
Filter by section