Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
Authorities are searching for answers to hundreds of questions now.
Many of which of course they hope it's -- will answer.
It's critically important for our intelligence agencies to understand the level of the degree of support.
These terrorists receive if -- from individuals organizations.
Perhaps even a country sponsoring these terrorist attacks joining us now former pentagon official Fox -- national security analysts.
KT McFarland former US ambassador to the United Nations Fox News contributor John Bolton.
Good to have you both here -- let's start with that is this a victory for the FBI is that some time.
That they should be celebrating our should they'd be about you winning.
How long it took for them to respond to that Russian.
Indication that we had a.
Problem now well I think that once the attack happened everybody did a great job the question I've got his.
You fifth -- near the Russians warned -- -- look Catherine this guy the FBI had him.
In custody or at least they were interrogating him and they said -- how big problem.
But I worry about -- is his whole notion that we're not calling what it is we don't -- Islamic extremists we don't say.
Jihadist we don't we don't talk about it because we don't want to offend anybody in the radical -- -- -- radical islamists who wanna kill us since like Harry Potter movie.
Where they never want to talk about the evil lord boulder -- always target animus -- who cannot be named the problem with that attitude now is if you don't recognize.
I think -- never -- it.
John -- head of the CIA.
It is saying that he doesn't want to call them jihadist who doesn't work all -- radical Islamist.
I have never heard.
And I want to say the straight up I mean -- -- apple I've talked with Middle -- scholars -- this.
Eight and and actually over two week period came up with the definition.
That -- ported to the religion.
To their view within the religion Jihad and the -- fate all of which are are of course.
In in in eluded him and are radical islamists but that didn't go crazy.
The people who understand this best are Muslims they know exactly what this is all about.
So the unwillingness of the John Brennan or Barack Obama or others and -- his administration.
To describe it in in in truly accurate terms I think here precludes us from responding effect.
-- with someone's just tell me why in the world.
We are watching an administration that initially refused to call -- -- people want to forget that.
They what they have still not acknowledge that this is seated.
In any kind of jihadist radical Islamist.
What is the point -- this and when are we going to see your breakthrough here in the mindset of a government by the way we should point out.
It would it's a mindset than it was shared by the Bush Administration.
At the end certainly -- -- are actually -- traffic as early as 2000 true and it was a major issue with them to use expression radical Islamist.
This nation is going to destroy itself if we can't even speak honestly about our enemy but it's OK I will because we'll pass the immigration bill and eleven million people get citizenship I'm sure -- -- a happy -- The way.
Give us your sense of it.
I think you -- I think it's all about a mindset they've decided that we don't you know political correctness we don't want to department -- -- in my -- discriminatory.
So we put these blinders on to what the -- and evidence that political correctness.
The backseat to common sense because if we're gonna let ourselves be blinded to what this challenges we are never going to adequately.
I think it goes beyond that I think this is an ideology this is an ideology that believes America's presence in the world is too strong that our support for Israel is too strong.
That the -- that the administration -- administration that the war on terrorism as defined by the book because we're basically and I were talking about.
The mindset of the yeah.
Q what it is the administration has this narrative we defeated we know each of them laden terrorism is over on to the next.
I've got to turn to Israel very quickly.
Secretary of defense -- in -- in Israel.
Suggesting that there'll be a ten billion dollar arms deal.
Making available for Israel set of advanced and military capabilities.
Are also something for everyone single set to visit Cairo.
The Riyadh and Abu Dhabi and to turn over to the United Arab Emirates of course from sixteen.
Fighter jets we would want to leave anyone out definitely.
Well I'm I'm all in favor the sale -- love selling American weapons overseas but what it reveals about the administration is contrary to their public record.
This is and hagel makes this argument this is a deterrence.
Arms sales package in his view it turns against them against Iran this is a concession.
That this administration is not gonna do -- -- militarily about Iran in nuclear weapons program.
And it will continue to pressure Israel MRSA mercilessly not to do anything you.
I mean if enterprises coming to town but -- Right I think the administration has decided we're not gonna stop -- -- anybody else want to go ahead but organic and ain't it.
Very -- -- were overtime.
Secretary of state -- the stumble.
All of the the -- -- all -- nations involved in those talks will funnel their money through one.
Rebel group in Syria right choice or wrong bad choice bad idea to fund these rebel groups.
-- house and rebel groups.
Who were you gotta find as you're guy gonna -- -- 999.
I agree and I think.
Thank you very much -- -- can thank you.
Filter by section