You're watching...
FBN’s Imus experts debate whether the government should use drones to kill terrorists even if they are American citizens.
Also in this playlist...
Auto-advance: ON
Auto-advance
This transcript is automatically generated
-- administration apparently approves the use of drones to kill terrorists.
Although our course of -- that is of you don't already know but exactly -- -- when it was going to be killed by the drone.
So they support that is from correctly about Roger -- But -- that so they support that but they oppose waterboarding to sound right so I oppose it all.
-- -- -- First -- -- in this in this drone situation the fact that they in the memo just came out last week the white paper that they can go after American citizens held without any due process.
Felices and attorney Hampshire you've you gotta be with him as well let's let's talk but -- what you do look like at the little -- table particularly.
-- like liquid -- is it now all eyes and indefinitely although.
Here with the -- -- -- -- -- -- Looks like he's going to let it looks better when his gym didn't work Blida.
By assistant Lana -- -- that actually taking sides on how.
Thriller never -- readers waterboarding right I don't waterboarding regard so.
Just trying to critics of and close a judge really is his attorneys -- reaching an agreement legally you can use should be she's gonna turn it like I'm an astronaut Blagojevich -- -- -- and -- And I minera surgeon don't object to got a little footnote deadlines on the people are put in jail as -- -- is that that is wrong.
-- that we should be torture you don't you don't get credible information by torturing in terms of drones.
The fact that we would target American citizens without due process and that white paper that said a high ranking government official would make the decision who who's deciding the -- are targeting.
And individual.
It's very unclear now the administration is not being very transparent about -- -- from a kill anybody I don't war while you don't target individuals in the war though the law the code of words you know target.
-- on assassinate individuals that were -- -- right now but I think -- key thing here is for the administration.
To.
Clarify what the word imminent threatening -- -- -- has it all goes by under the law right -- What the word imminent threat means to the United States prince and.
Hearted -- this denial -- nobody what most people for a broad -- say all lucky and even his son and they kill him but that did -- latest question is about American citizens and amid personally have no problem with our government a drone killing Johnny Taliban on the fields of Afghanistan.
And and and know most most Republicans -- most people on the right don't what they're pointing out is that hypocrisy.
Of -- the view that the Obama administration saying they're against waterboarding yet they can just against is that somebody you to do it.
Yeah and resting at the hypocrisy of the -- -- it -- -- -- critical it looks hypocritical I agree with you but -- it is evident that -- got -- look at it is.
It's okay.
When you have enemy combatant in the Geneva conventions apply them started it's illegal it's clear that we got to get through this right and so the waterboarding -- powered by just stepping up -- sent -- Get a real answer whereas terrorists they're not covered by the Geneva conventions of the drones are okay -- definitely are delivered by the -- Legally last night.
Our Internet if you're very just like waterboarding were not trying to meet a legal standard and drug.
But that -- some brings some not.
We're talking about.
Google Talk at least we're trying to talk about what's appropriate behaviors on that observant dominant -- Mary Milliken and neighborhoods community college law class -- We ethnic verified it but -- -- -- what imminent threat means and be transparent.
And still are put on -- because it couldn't get any attention.
Campaign attention and I am for waterboarding and I amoral our joint reward of where people there's no credible haven't -- gotten any information anybody that waterboarding and other rightly says we -- been -- toward -- No income no credible information what aboard this guy finally behind money I -- -- -- -- behind -- and that remains higher course you agree not just -- would you at least agree that waterboarding.
The slot.
For that water board where the water border or the -- aboard the dollar tumbled.
A lot of authority by the way that's not all a much different than going -- one of these Six Flags amusement park isn't what it.
And when they were reported seeing -- feel lot of products and I'm -- yeah they have is an amusement park Madison joins -- -- -- I'm about thirty seconds for voluntary waterboarding a little of the rule.
A lot -- ran -- If defend our conscious you know evidently don't ever produce any information Osama bin Laden easily -- Geneva convention -- as you know is so our own people when they're POWs don't get treated poorly expand our own protection of our own American people.
Entertainment dollar aren't Arabs weren't part of our and the middle of amounts from -- and -- also -- -- piece of information on a Bill O'Reilly as a -- solar.
Genius to know about those yeah.
Why does this is -- -- is such a great idea.
That it's stupid and there's new book and then -- their budget on this new book we -- -- announcement last -- on Russia look at.
The -- book called killing juices.
-- -- -- -- On yeah -- it another great idea yeah I it's -- against are now 00 yeah yeah oversold -- I don't.
So what can this is the theme now every I don't know I don't know -- -- about an immigrant.
Ranking no -- Jesus that's an interesting case -- -- the most -- killing in the war.
About a -- and because there was the about friend -- Freeman says the crowd dollars soon pictures of privacy heroes -- the root of Jesus on the mistrust about -- -- Where your fingers of one of the Phillies but as Paramus -- crowd that we're gonna -- around historical exports is missiles.
And apparently some happening.
Moved back to -- on the table and or are not a great idea pay dividends not because or do you think -- -- -- It is -- to occur until we're -- only the Romans.
Can -- think yes absolutely -- and one way to read the book and find out.
We'll end up they they -- in its -- many -- -- his -- now that's little now this.
