You're watching...

Colorado Businesses Pushing Pot Tourism

Details

  • Description

    Attorney Arthur Aidala on the legal problems that arise from the trip.

  • Duration 5:05
  • Date

Clips

Also in this playlist...

Regulation

Auto-advance: ON

Auto-advance

Transcript

This transcript is automatically generated

Let's get to the push to make -- to speak tourist attraction in Colorado could this be a movement for lawyers.

You leave Colorado with the Paula -- not allowed to do that you get caught in all of us in trouble so let's bring in that criminal defense attorney off.

Now we've tortured because I can see a lot of this house.

I mean it's legal and in Colorado.

I think combined eight of an ounce so you go to a different Paul tells -- walk away with a nice bounce at a low price.

I could see a lot of people trying to get out of the states and bring it back to New Jersey new you all and I think you'll gonna have a Booth over a thousand.

You're about the guidance is yeah we're not gonna pay my mortgage but.

You are correct especially because you know marijuana cells were pretty good price -- you know that there is no such thing as a ten dollar bag or anything like that everything is.

I deal -- -- on a regular basis here in New York City.

Professionally.

I will tell you based on Amsterdam the the issue that they have an Amsterdam -- people sending.

Putting you in in packages and and sending it out of -- that gave Iraqis the country hero -- -- state because.

If you send out let's even say it's small -- announced.

You do it twenty times to yourself and you come back to New Jersey New York Connecticut in your salad on the street so.

-- couple thousand bucks without really break in the -- that you think that if somebody manuals.

At a quantity to oppose and in new you'll.

And if they get court what's your defense well here is well before we get the -- -- up.

Let's talk about what it -- the bigger trouble for first -- -- everyone -- to understand about all of these states legalizing marijuana.

It's really a fox -- because it's.

He's a federal crime it's still a federal crime -- marijuana club at -- that President Obama could pick up the phone right now called ahead the FBI think.

-- don't know.

-- -- -- is legal lock everyone they have.

Shut down some places look at look at your in the manner and I want -- We know the bottom you know we're all living roughly criminal law passed to some degree let's get an -- -- the nitty gritty like slightly right now hundred -- request -- thank -- that somebody mails a little now one of the summit in New York City.

-- -- -- They are presumably baffled guilty of a federal crime got it and wanted to -- -- want is -- -- that they gonna happen.

Mean he reached out any legal defense put into practical defense.

I didn't know all I -- in Colorado it's just like about what appears he's in Colorado to ski place.

Why can't -- -- if it's legal in Colorado -- could smoke a Colorado like a possessive and Colorado.

Why can't I just think it's small quantity back to because there will be big signs up at the apple and a host obviously that's okay can certainly if you read ahead in all of the literature yes that's what's happening -- -- for every afternoon Washington -- that.

But since two I have not a -- -- -- will be this they get out the guy with a -- yeah.

All the time somebody does that go to though the -- prosecutors -- look.

It's a twenty year old kid they never been in trouble before please don't ruin their future they'll do community service they'll pay a fine don't give them a crime that'll make them prevent them from being a doctor a lawyer accountant or something like that sometimes -- just fall on the -- other times.

Steve did a little backdoor way to get out of things avid diver who -- -- Okay I'll Donnelley to -- about -- defense but sometimes.

Out prosecutor who's got an open mind and take into consideration and I can't figure had a disposition.

It -- more for -- -- before -- a woman in Missouri is suing.

For the cost of raising -- now one year old child because she says the birth control I think -- pills that she took -- control pills would be affected she got pregnant even though she was taken birth control pills to shepherd case.

I believe she does because the birth control pill company.

At three months have -- she's pregnant.

Issues a recall.

And -- -- it's not what we would call a product liability case that the actual pill was effective.

But -- put the pills.

In the carousel the wrong way through that -- she was on her monthly you have break -- she's bulls be taking a placebo just to keep you in the mode of taking the pills.

Those were actually strong real pills and then what she would not regulating she was stake in the placebo.

And they aren't -- this that's negligence -- consortium -- -- you come out today and you of the script for tomorrow when yesterday in Europe.

I mean this is no excuse for that WR and off output it is a -- of control -- -- I'm -- -- -- had -- out of control program originated.

-- -- we totally messed up and now you have the cost of raising a child okay how much can he get Acosta live in a child absolutely and their -- -- -- I don't figure it out and say look you know that the -- this is.

Twelve -- she went to the same company the same birth control pill no problems.

They admit they made a mistake there's liability -- called.

But off cut off aid ala pleasure bonding with you.

Real close that he ought to do -- but I have -- that's -- Thank god.

Up next.