You're watching...
National Republican Fundraiser Noelle Nikpour on political contributions from Hollywood.
Also in this playlist...
Auto-advance: ON
Auto-advance
This transcript is automatically generated
Hollywood stars help the president keep the White House but eventually find out that one noticeable one notable liberal want to gave big time to the other side.
Federal election records showing actor Tim Robbins donated by -- to ten Republicans.
-- -- 2006 election cycle.
Let's ask the geo and all of that poor weather this shows that the left that's circled know.
You know what I think it's really interesting and want a one Citi contributed to was Michelle Bachmann that was -- she felt polarizing.
On the right side -- with like.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Would like one of the biggest Occupy Wall Street -- supporters he is definitely one of the the arts left that the left -- my thoughts read the report gotta be honest I thought what happened was.
Remember she left him with a ping pong player I -- that's like that I thought it was a sort of look like.
Whenever I'm gonna donate to the Republicans.
Federal board that its wealth and hopes that -- What.
You know I don't know and I think that a lie you know just because you're in Hollywood and -- -- Democrat before he doesn't mean that you're -- automatically.
Agree and maybe this is what kind of what we're saying what.
Recent late Mark Zuckerberg the banks not gonna -- it just did an advance for our Republican governor Chris Christie -- so this does not all -- all out.
All of those that -- -- meant argues no longer a pure Republican and a I get a theories becoming one of these hybrids -- RI public and part whatever you know and what hiking.
Hello uranium but -- -- the in the meantime though.
ISM corporations listen Wall Street does that they donate to both sides corporations that they donate to both sides.
Would this be some sort of indication and maybe how he really felt that the time knowing that did this to come out later in -- really consequence on the do you see that -- that the people pull his -- that these events of the -- that people are reported over -- -- You know what and I and -- been on chat with people that -- because aside -- are really agree with your viewpoint but I have to take the opposing view.
Tells you a lot you know I think that if they wouldn't catch so much heat for I think that you will see you would've seen more.
Contributions.
Coming towards Republicans -- you know I think that if -- and holly weird.
You have to really kind of watch now.
You get -- and you give your.
-- you know says it's so amazing though because as much as Hollywood these actors say that this stand for the issues.
It's still about a quid pro quo you know you see how.
You know after this last that's bits and spending bill how they got these gigantic break everyone got tax hikes but Hollywood didn't get that sides Goldman Sachs were renting office space at the new.
Freedom Tower didn't got you know they get tax breaks.
It's so amazing that no one really seems to stand on principle it's always standing.
On the wall with no matter who they are yet one more attempts to -- and that's hypocritical.
How what hypocritical I would I ever put those -- things that I imagine how how how things -- -- for you in other words that we had this big thing that the political action committees.
Does that make life better for you -- or harder for you.
Well you know I thank with a lot of the super -- from a big supporter of the super pacs just because -- raise money for super pacs and I make.
Money off -- But -- -- -- -- -- longer than one giant super -- as opposed to you know smaller individual campaign until and I you know it kind of depends on what you're what you're trying to -- if there's an issue oriented super -- of course you know like -- the NRA and gun control there's a lot of you know.
Pack now they're often a bright like Korea by candlelight death but about the also -- her with the Chuck Hagel was at least three -- back -- -- might.
It is so this is something that's just not every four years we're gonna be saying this all the time and you know -- Whenever this starts to run rampant which it is right now look for it to be regulated.
Look for these super pacs eventually to be regulated because you know a lot of people -- complaint on both sides.
That it's let's just giving example it's like George Soros with puppets -- verses shelled out often with a mystery to become you know.
Our races got two very wealthy billionaires.
Playing -- that this is why you know super pacs people frown -- Would you dare as as someone who raises money say that it's may be tanking the system and all.
Charles thank you yeah.
I thought you looked fantastic thing let me go to the -- too much money in politics.
I think a lot of people -- say it's making things.
Yes you know I think a lot of people are worried that it's got -- -- uber wealthy buying a message.
And I think that if you would increase some of the limits with the campaign's current I think you'll see the super pacs -- -- -- -- big one -- the wayside.
But right now they if you really want to make a powerful punch and politics you're gonna go and put your money.
And a super pac because you have control over the message.
And what she died so it's pretty heavy control so if you wanted her -- go to super -- well in the fourth -- like thanks we'll.
