You're watching...

Has Obama Driven Wall Street to Vote for Romney?

Details

  • Description

    Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani on the Presidential race and the Department of Justice’s decision not to file charges against Goldman Sachs...

  • Duration 4:08
  • Date

Clips

Also in this playlist...

Latest Video

Auto-advance: ON

Auto-advance

Transcript

This transcript is automatically generated

His body race is looking -- sold now President Obama is hitting the Rockies yes president.

-- another crucial swing state of Colorado today.

Justice we learn former backers at GE.

Is Goldman Sachs are giving him the cold shoulder.

Put donations are now going from them to Republicans -- what's worst tonight Mitt Romney is making big cash she's attending a string of fundraisers today in the Big Apple.

The former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani Wall Street warming up to Mitt in -- -- -- White House.

This time at back -- what.

Are you surprised I'm not not at all -- much the president that President Obama has spent three and a half years.

Just absolutely attacking that heck out of Wall Street making them appear as if -- bunch of crooks.

A bunch of rich.

That gets yet get people have no ethics PS left no.

So what's hot I actually believe that this is a certain level of personal insult -- involved in this not just.

Economics not just politics I think -- I know people.

That feel that he's personally insulted them I had one gentleman is very successful man tell me that.

President Obama has made me look -- in the eyes of my grandchildren.

Who my grand everywhere children my grandchildren say to me granddad your rich.

-- -- I worked -- -- guys that worked I worked my heck -- -- head off to I didn't nobody gave me this money I didn't steal it I don't honestly.

Give it but that bear the one thing about the simply wasn't like going from a 5545.

To 4555.

This was.

75%.

Of the -- and oh wait from Wall Street weighted Goldman Sachs -- Goldman Sachs went to Obama.

Now it's 75%.

Going to -- this is a huge point.

Well I mean for a first of all he's made them -- you know right at the point of the spear.

But also of these people understand our economy they understand what's gonna put me like next year -- -- this vote Obama gets reelected.

We're gonna have a terrible year next year thing on the other hand they have a pretty good sense of what's gonna happen if Romney gets elected.

Taxes lower corporate tax law or regulations.

Even doubts of the it would not pursuing businesses -- need needlessly a president that talks nice about business.

The president that gives a good feeling for investment -- good feeling for growth.

I mean that it's a difference between a bit here next year -- a good -- next.

We haven't -- -- for -- no question about it but but he you have to address the independents out there that are saying.

I don't know Wall Street Washington that -- I don't know that seems kind of slippery debate so Wall Street's going with Romney may be that -- I'm not so sure about.

-- take a look at Hollywood is going would Obama -- and main street is never had a particularly good reaction to Hollywood going with somebody.

I -- either the reality is that -- -- Wall Street has an awful lot to do.

What -- the people get jobs and not.

When we have a strong market when we have strong investments we have lots of people working.

For people middle class people rich people.

I think that most Americans have an instinctual understanding of our economy one that doesn't as the president of the United States he's working on -- different kind of an economy.

That -- some other country not America.

What are you what do you make of the news that broke just at the top of the hour Bob Goldman Sachs.

The the did that they've said no we're not gonna prosecute in anyway so is just say you were of course a former US attorney.

What do you make of defective made an announcement about the fact they're not gonna prosecute was its -- get the same time Goldman's pay some fines over some of their transactions.

Well I don't -- might be a little bit of the Eliot Spitzer method of prosecuting which is intimidate.

Extort the -- prove -- case but take a 300000600.

Million -- Merrill Lynch.

Because they can't take the investigation personal -- -- market cap.

But then when you gotta go prove your case and when Eliot Spitzer had to prove its case against Dick Grasso whom out of court no -- so.

Admitted it may very well be.

That there was no justification for a prosecution of of Goldman Sachs but maybe there was no justification.

For harassing and to the extent of the underestimated.

Talk about -- for.