Fox Business
Expand
Browse All Video
Watch Live

You're watching...

Mass Town Bans Profanity in Public

Details

  • Description

    FOX News Legal Analyst Lis Wiehl and Deirdre Imus debate the legality of the fine.

  • Duration 5:42
  • Date

Clips

Also in this playlist...

Regulation

Auto-advance: ON

Auto-advance
View All

Transcript

This transcript is automatically generated

Faster -- health crisis supported part of -- John McCain is coming up later.

We'll talk never run out time -- blot off a lot.

That -- that Deirdre Imus.

At least -- wanted to sign us good morning from Imus real good morning mr.

Imus he's -- -- earnings router to the Imus cattle -- to have to -- -- did come on Friday around here Friday -- is.

Dialogue objective about that -- -- yes to have had a lot to do it again irony moment.

Well the talk care about.

Those are good substitute -- swearing in public.

-- -- -- -- Would apply -- review.

Did a better read the southern -- -- town of a Middlesbrough.

Voted on Monday.

To impose a twenty dollar -- on public profanity.

People's right Republican directed mostly but I say that teenagers.

Another young people by.

-- whenever I hear that.

Legislative some all flight deck and on kids when it's mostly.

Like my wife is.

Scream and up to daughter me in public as the -- is not a good ideas that legal for Foley's.

No it's not legal it's highly I mean come on as a First Amendment issue unless you have fighting words you know yelling fire in a crowded theater something like that.

Come on cussing we all grew up costing an -- don't like get a maybe it's not a great thing around our kids that you can't regulate that and find it it's ridiculous and -- -- I mean do you -- I'd love you dearly but I mean them.

Thousands of dollars should be into what -- -- -- really horrible.

-- -- -- -- -- -- They is that yeah.

Lender cuts -- but he just so we are grew up cussing liked I don't -- I don't.

I don't wanna be censored I don't think anyone should be censored first -- -- I a 100% agree I just think that's crazy.

The people can start censoring what people say in public but don't have also borrow well the baby Jesus.

-- personally offended by -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- In and you're gonna regulate -- yeah and why.

Well no I've not been involved perhaps not done to -- this is actually crazy thought it was a joke at first.

Yeah -- it's it's laughable to -- to think you're gonna censor people it's wrong you can't censor people I'm totally against that market.

On now we have another subject -- -- On does having gay parents -- Disadvantage of -- kids.

Solid they did a survey and call.

Among a number of people but.

If it didn't have found other Muslim.

There wasn't just two day trip -- Boston gay people.

Decided to have kids it turns out.

This study of people who have engaged.

In same sex relationships.

But off from -- -- households.

-- -- don't know does that mean.

People who -- and traditional.

Heterosexual relationships but then decided.

Or -- -- day and then well what does that mean.

-- the basic foundation of this study.

Is is sound hypocritical because most of these gay people that they're talking about -- -- have these relationships and then they have these children.

They're there on.

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- You know most in gay people are coming out of straight.

Marriages.

With that with a mom and a dad -- so.

What what is so just based on that this doesn't ring true.

I mean yes sometimes when you see that there's more problems some -- sometimes emotion and psychologically with.

And children from.

You know maybe single parent or divorced parents -- that was a bad divorce -- things like that.

But so they're sort of comparing that to this with a lot of the according to this study this is also studied by the way that's been financed.

I conservative exactly thank you very much -- that really that was out there right now because -- higher agreeing on both of these top I know this might now and again.

This is not a good blonde on blonde but I totally agree and and I don't think this study doesn't make any sense -- the actually read the whole study it doesn't make sense it's completely biased.

And imagine this you can pointed -- families at a fraction would ever and the kids have a harder time but.

Think about families -- together where that marriage whether it's two men two women to man and woman is a horrible marriage and those kids or to damage that -- as well.

Also again it goes back to my Pulaski a lot of this is an -- one -- states army we know.

Plenty of kids from single parenting or no parents have been adopted now -- and have cancer to have.

All these different illnesses and they survival that and don't have those problems -- the talking about in this study in fact -- being these role models in society.

I'm in the last hour here on me -- Imus in the morning programmer and -- total overall -- of -- tepid saying well hold additional -- hello all of the -- -- pretty good -- agree integrated it and I can't hear you see it looks better than normal.

We're subject to Canadian -- -- that's a -- via new man.

LaMont have a new man on the -- -- -- might have a new man on the menu actually just -- -- the -- changed immediately in times I don't look at a billion and a definite national lesbian and my second wearing my tourists wearing right now.

All right now I -- so.

Load More