This transcript is automatically generated
Breaking it is arguments before the Supreme Court about the health care law.
On their third and final day and the court is expected to take a short break any moment now let's go to Peter Barnes right now he's -- live at the the court with a special -- -- Peter.
-- in economy we are getting some breaking news out of the courtroom for our -- at the Wall Street Journal on this issue of -- ability whether.
Other pieces of the Health Care Reform -- can go forward if the individual mandate is struck down according to the journal justice Sonia Sotomayor.
Into rock did the challenger is lawyer Paul Clement who was arguing -- the whole law should be invalidated.
If that one piece is found to be unconstitutional she said why shouldn't we like congress decide what to do about -- ability well joining me now -- the reaction is the attorney general.
Buddy Caldwell he's a Republican.
Attorney general what about that why don't like congress -- congress already had a chance -- -- you know.
Others -- presumption and -- any active so have verbal.
That comes out.
You usually have it stated that -- several -- congress didn't stated course they had the opportunity to do it.
There's a presumption that it several -- To make it clear that it's not so ever -- you need to put.
It's not several -- -- mayor but the reason to have that not several -- to Begin with -- -- finance.
The mandate if it's upheld -- bomb.
Backs is gonna -- because there is no way to finance Jack put up the money so -- abilities are pretty crucial issue.
And there are some pretty interest and banks that couldn't be financed anyway if it's deemed to -- -- -- -- on this issue part of it is the intent of congress the justices do look at the record the house bill.
Did have a provision on several -- ever ability it's said that it would be several -- But the senate bill did not and the final product did not.
I think it's kind of a trick I think if you look at the politics -- It's kind of a -- disillusioned.
Smoke in mayor's desire no -- we don't say -- it's not so ever ball.
Bennett but I didn't -- -- inseparable and I think that was intent but they decided not to -- That it was several so.
I think they wanted that impression but to -- that's deceive Ben and I believe it's just now coming out now and the problem for the justices as is one of the appellate court said that.
Was some -- so that's what they have to wrestle with -- -- -- McConnell -- US attorney general thank you.