This transcript is automatically generated
On the argument for raising taxes as you know professors that the way we're going if we don't bring in more revenue won't -- will never be able to afford this I always.
Come back and while we're over the we could -- -- -- -- -- to do that do.
But it's always even among the moderate Republicans as an as a we have to do both and we have to -- And and yet.
That a recent Republican candidate today.
When the idea was raised about a ten to one -- -- spending dollar cuts to every one dollar revenue pipe.
Other candidates were against of the crowd certainly -- that particularly evening it I was against it.
But is there a ratio for Thomas Sowell is there -- ratio.
That you would consider or is just the idea.
Of hiking taxes in this bloated spending environment.
By any degree against any racist just out of the question.
The ratio really doesn't matter you get promised a thousand the won a million -- one whatever.
The way it where it works is that you first passed the law that were raised the tax rate.
And that you promised over the next X number of years to cut spending and you simply never do.
I mean that this game has been played over and over again -- at least as far back of the Reagan administration.
Is -- much like it's a Charlie Brown running up the kick the football.
At the last minute -- -- -- football way and Charlie Brown fall in this space I mean that game has been played so many sides.
Of the you know the the with the Democrats whole -- Republicans are right -- -- the tax rate if you agree to spending cuts fine.
And big -- all of the number they bring it out and doesn't matter they raise the tax rate first.
And later on the other spending cuts now if they were -- to say listen.
We're gonna cut the spending for the next three years at the of those three years will raise the tax rate then than they would have had to have something to talk about.
But they're not there yet.
On these Wall Street protesters is -- sure you're aware professor.
Event their real frustrations out as the name would imply Wall Street and the fat -- there have been bailed out senator.
And and they argue that look.
We gave -- money they're not sharing the wealth there.
They're they're not lending they're not doing -- this leaving aside the fact that they got into the pickle they were in.
Because they're globalism Nilly lending and and and and just signing on the loans that they can do in in retrospect were questioned leading that's -- What do you think of that anger the president is obviously signed on board whether it relates more to them certainly than it does to the -- partners and Democrats in general it's.
I'm afraid if the government to come to me and say wanted to give me millions of dollars though it's a sure I do in my bank account number of -- -- But the problem is not the people accept this money the problem is that the politics is offering the money.
You know that's brilliant if that politicians are offering.
Always supposed you and your -- professor.
It's easy to.
In concert to be -- it's -- it's when He on this but I guess it doesn't really matter cards I.
Don't bet on -- -- Of financiero auto company.
You roll with the punches you don't make because I've talked to many prominent Republicans.
Who's say it's a man -- woman if we didn't do what we did then.
God knows what -- Jack Welch among.
Well -- I I would certainly say that the non bank.
People who got the money I just don't see that -- the point of it.
General Motors what would have happened -- General Motors had got the bailout He would be buying more Toyota's and it would cost the taxpayers less.