Also in this playlist...
This transcript is automatically generated
We've got a lot to cover here in just a moment because of all that is happening in the world of science and physics.
Major news today as a team of researchers challenge one of the fundamental laws of the universe a veritable truth.
Albert Einstein's theory of special relativity in question after a team of scientists discovered a sub atomic particle a neutrino that travels faster than the speed of light impossible you say and there.
And the world of science filed so as well.
NASA also -- tonight a disabled satellite the size of a school bus could be headed straight for the United States -- four hours ago.
This was the only country -- was certain to miss.
This is the biggest piece of -- jumped to fall from the sky in thirty years.
Here now to assess these stories and the EPA's abuse of power Steve along founder publisher of junk science dot com author of the book Green hell.
Analyst plan to control your life and what you can do to stop them Steve good to have you here.
What so -- threatening let's turn first and this may be.
The inverse of what would we be reasonable -- I wanna deal first with the neutrino.
That is moving faster than the speed of light violating every basic law that most of us and study -- is absolute scientific truth.
The about what we we we don't know they discovered anything yet they may have systematic experimental error.
You know they have measured this neutrino are going to bastions speed of light several times.
But we know that you -- -- is traveling intergalactic -- -- right here with the speed of at the speed of light.
If what they were saying was true then those -- -- would allow what would arrive approximately.
Four years or so before it like does.
So they got a long way to go there's gotta be careful investigation their experiment.
And that investigation under way at least nine other laboratories -- to embark into precisely that experiment that is trying to measure.
Of the speed of nutrients just as they did to replicate.
Of their result and if so then we have a major major deal space junk six talking about major deals six and a half times.
Art and apparently now in all likelihood falling to earth in the United States.
The one country that have been ruled out just yesterday.
-- -- What what do you think.
Well -- the odds of that junk hitting anybody are one in the trillions.
I don't understand why people are worried about this I'm more worried that Obama junk which has a 100% probability of reckon our economy.
That's what people need to be focused on not stuff fault.
Well some people might say that fact collision is already occurred.
Well dealing with aftermath now we're not not prospects.
What well -- -- we may with these satellite -- it's interesting that NASA does not have a good.
Fix on where approximately.
This satellite will -- I mean -- the science is.
Right now well behind.
Of what appears to be the event why you -- well.
Well it's just it's difficult to follow its smallest moved fast to the lord we can have our scientists saying things like President Obama did it's hard.
Because He is difficult beach is -- -- President Bush.
And now our scientists echoing President Obama we've got to get real leadership.
-- they possibly if they knew where it was gonna land they could do something about it.
At the very least issue -- warning but they don't need to see these things are unpredictable you know this is not like the Apollo space capsule.
Used to float down to earth gently naked they can calculate that this is a lot more uncertain.
Well a lot.
A lot more in certain dollar on a night in which the laws of physics seems to be about possibly all the more uncertain.
Well one thing is certain the EPA still on the cross hairs of Steve Malloy we thank you for being here.
And it also.
In the cross hairs of the second family.
-- who will be taking the EPA to the Supreme Court.
At the beginning.
Next you're ruling expected thank you very much Dave should have warned they have -- junk science dot com.
Filter by section